Tesla Finishes Near Dead Last In 2021 J.D. Power Dependability Survey

Cars Parked In Front Of Company Building

As Model S and Model X vehicles (and even some Model 3s) age further with each day, we're guessing there are going to be an awful lot of stories about the quality of Tesla vehicles deteriorating as they get older. That's because, as we have noted several times (here and here), Teslas don't exactly seem like they are top quality the day they roll off the line.

And it appears J.D. Power agrees with us - the American data analytics and consumer intelligence company placed Tesla 30th out of 33 manufacturers in its most recent Vehicle Dependability Survey. 

The survey looked at 177 specific problems in 8 categories, the report says. This includes "powertrain, exterior flaws, and HVAC issues" among other issues. The 2021 study looks at the 2018 model year. Tesla was fourth from the bottom of the list, averaging 176 issues per 100 vehicles. 

"The automaker is not officially ranked among other brands in the study because it doesn’t meet the ranking criteria. Unlike other manufacturers, Tesla doesn’t grant J.D. Power permission to survey its owners in 15 states where it is required. However, Tesla’s score was calculated based on a robust sample of surveys from owners in the other 35 states," J.D. Power's press releases read. 

Back in 2020, Tesla also posted abysmal scores in the U.S. Initial Quality Study. The brand scored an abysmal 250 in 2020, placing it below literally dozens of other manufacturers, including names like Land Rover and Audi, in terms of reliability.

The U.S. Initial Quality Study has been put out annually for the last 34 years and works by asking buyers of new cars of the current model year what problems they have had within the first 90 days of owning a vehicle. The score is based on the number of problems experienced within those 90 days per 100 vehicles. 

Recall, we also pointed out hours ago that Tesla was once again slashing prices internationally, marking the 13th time this year that the company has tried to stoke demand by lowering prices. 

1 2
View single page >> |

Disclaimer: Copyright ©2009-2021 ZeroHedge.com/ABC Media, LTD; All Rights Reserved. Zero Hedge is intended for Mature Audiences. Familiarize yourself with our legal and use policies ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
William K. 2 weeks ago Member's comment

"Quality" does not deteriorate with age, But Quality, or lack of it, certainly will become more obvious with age. Certainly condition and reliability can drop rapidly with age or use, but quality must be present initially to be there at all. Unfortunately many seem to equate features with quality, because it is much easier to point out features that can be impressive. Selling price cuts are a very interesting thing indeed. The high initial price is for those who want the product first, and to whom a high price is no deterrent to being first. After that the price must drop a bit to reach the buyers who are a bit more rational in that they do not need to be first in line for what they want. There are also often reductions in production costs as experience is gained in what it takes to produce the product, and which variations do not sell well. This may or not lead to another drop, depending on sales. The final price cut comes from consideration of the cost of the unsold product versus the loss in profit because of a price reduction. The problem is that actual quality usually does cost a bit more when it is designed into a product, and the cost is a lot different than the cost of many features, which may be just a few additional lines of code in the product software. Actual quality usually means having greater safety margins for performance and more durable structure. None of that is free.

James Sinclair 2 weeks ago Member's comment

Ouch!