Slow Day At Highs For S&P And Nasdaq

black android smartphone turned on screen

Image Source: Unsplash

I experienced mixed fortune day trading, unable to catch gain traction on my positional calls, resulting in a small net loss. This expressed itself as narrow range doji for both the Nasdaq and S&P.

For the S&P there was a fresh 'buy' signal in the MACD as part of the 5,500 breakout. Volume edged a little higher, counting as registered accumulation. The slow down in the rally opens up for a reversal and test of breakout support.

The Nasdaq edged over bearish wedge resistance, also on the back of a new MACD trigger 'buy'. The index is more vulnerable to a reversal as a cut below wedge support would likely deliver a greater loss than a similar breach in S&P support.

The Russell 2000 (IWM) experienced a scrappy day. The 20-day and 50-day MAs have both converged, but neither can play as consistent support. I think this needs a larger move to the 200-day MA before buyers can work something. Slow stochastics continue to drift lower below the bullish mid-line.

I will be watching Nasdaq breadth metrics closely. There may be one more leg up before the inevitable downswing emerges. We do have a new secular bull market as long as the Nasdaq an stay above 16,500, but even a drop below this would only slow the advance. Should the latter happen, then I would be looking for oversold breadth metrics to signal a bottom.

For tomorrow, I will be looking for pre-market downside for a probable gap down in the S&P and Nasdaq. If pre-market holds, then buyers will have the opportunity to create an opening gap to new highs, although it does seem like sellers have the edge. The Russell 2000 ($IWM) remains a mess and I don't expect much from it in either direction.


More By This Author:

S&P And Nasdaq Continue To Diverge From Russell 2000
S&P And Nasdaq Continue To Make The Running
Late Selling Sends Markets Below Their Friday Open Price

Disclaimer: Investors should not act on any information in this article without obtaining specific advice from their financial advisors and should not rely on information herein as the primary ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments