Image Source: Unsplash
 

Stock market circuit breakers are regulatory measures designed to temporarily halt trading on an exchange to curb panic selling and provide a cooling-off period for investors. These mechanisms are triggered when significant declines occur in major stock indices, such as the S&P 500, within a single trading day. The primary objective is to maintain orderly market operations and allow investors time to assess information before making further trading decisions.

Current Circuit Breaker Thresholds:

As established by U.S. securities exchanges, the circuit breaker thresholds for the S&P 500 are:

• Level 1: A 7% decline from the prior day’s closing price halts trading for 15 minutes.
• Level 2: A 13% decline results in another 15-minute halt.
• Level 3: A 20% decline halts trading for the remainder of the trading day.

These measures apply to declines that occur before 3:25 p.m. ET; after this time, only a Level 3 halt would be implemented.
 

Historical Instances of Circuit Breakers in the S&P 500

October 27, 1997 (“Mini-Crash”):

The first instance of a market-wide circuit breaker being triggered occurred on October 27, 1997. On this day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) fell 554 points, a 7.18% drop, prompting the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) to halt trading early under the existing circuit breaker rules.

March 2020 (COVID-19 Pandemic) Crash:

In March 2020, amid escalating concerns over the COVID-19 pandemic’s economic impact, the S&P 500 experienced extreme volatility, leading to multiple circuit breaker activations:

• March 9, 2020: The S&P 500 dropped 7% shortly after the market opened, triggering a Level 1 circuit breaker and resulting in a 15-minute trading halt.
• March 12, 2020: Another 7% decline occurred shortly after the opening bell, leading to a second Level 1 halt within the same week.
• March 16, 2020: The market opened with a significant drop, and within minutes, the S&P 500 fell by 7%, activating the third Level 1 circuit breaker in a span of eight days.
• March 18, 2020: Unlike the previous instances, the circuit breaker was triggered in the afternoon when the S&P 500 declined by 7%, leading to another temporary halt in trading.

These events marked the first time since 1997 that the market-wide circuit breakers were activated, underscoring the severity of the market’s reaction to the unfolding global crisis.

In essence, they don’t happen often, only two periods since being introduced have they been activated.
 

Some background on Stock Market Circuit Breakers

These thresholds are market-wide (affecting all stocks and equity options), and are coordinated across exchanges. Notably, these broader circuit breakers are distinct from single-stock “limit up / limit down” halts, which address excessive volatility in individual stock prices. In both cases, the purpose is similar, and that is to calm markets and prevent disorderly free-falls. But market-wide circuit breakers focus on the overall market’s plunge rather than one stock’s move.
 

Early Implementation After 1987

The first circuit breaker rules (implemented late 1987/1988) were originally tied to Dow Jones Industrial Average point drops, since the S&P 500 trigger system came later. Initially, a 250-point drop in the Dow would halt trading for one hour, and a 400-point drop would trigger a two-hour halt. At the time, those thresholds were enormous moves, and were roughly the equivalent to a 12% and 19% market decline, respectively. These curbs were put in place in 1988 as a direct response to Black Monday’s chaos. The goal was to create a cooling-off period during any future steep sell-off, allowing traders and investors to “stop for breath” and prevent panic from feeding on itself. In practice, these rules weren’t tested right away; the late 1980s and early 1990s saw volatility, but nothing that immediately tripped the new system.

Refinements of the stock market circuit breakers in the 1990’s

As years passed, the fixed point thresholds began to look dated. Markets were rising, so a 250-point drop was no longer as large in percentage terms. Regulators adjusted the rules: in 1996 the halt durations were shortened (to 30 minutes for the first trigger, 1 hour for the second), and in early 1997 the trigger levels were raised to 350 and 550 Dow points (from 250/400). By 1997, however, the Dow was much higher than in 1988 – those 350 and 550 point thresholds translated to roughly a 5% and 8% decline respectively. In other words, the new point-based circuit breakers had become easier to hit in a routine bad day than the original 12% threshold. Little did regulators know that these updated breakers were about to face their first live test.

The 1997 “Mini-Crash”

One of the most notable instances of circuit breakers being triggered was the October 27, 1997 “mini-crash.” On that day, U.S. markets plunged in reaction to the Asian financial crisis, and was the first real activation of the post-1987 market-wide halt mechanism. Around 2:36 p.m. that day, the Dow Jones Average had fallen by 350 points (about –4.5%), tripping the Level 1 circuit breaker (under the 350-point rule) and halting trading for 30 minutes. This pause was meant to stop the bleeding and let everyone assess the situation. When trading resumed at 3:06 p.m., however, selling continued almost immediately. The Dow quickly tumbled further, down over 550 points in total (about –7.2%), which hit the second threshold. Because this second trigger occurred after 3:30 p.m., it ended trading for the remainder of the day. The market closed early, about half an hour ahead of the normal 4 p.m. close.

The 1997 halt was brief but historic: it marked the first time the market-wide circuit breakers had ever been activated since their inception. In the aftermath, there was much debate about whether the halts helped or hurt. Critics noted that a second halt so late in the day, for what was in percentage terms a moderate 7% dip, might have exacerbated panic, essentially trapping traders in an anxious timeout and then dumping them into a closed market. The SEC’s post-mortem on the episode concluded that the thresholds were set too low relative to market conditions. In fact, the first halt on Oct. 27, 1997 kicked in at a –4.5% decline, a magnitude the market had seen on numerous occasions historically without needing a shutdown. Observers also speculated that because everyone knew a second breaker would close the market for the day, some traders rushed to sell even harder after the first halt, trying to get out before an early close. This “mini-crash” made it clear that the circuit breaker system needed fine-tuning.
 

Evolution of the System

Switch to Percentages: In February 1998, just a few months after the mini-crash, U.S. exchanges agreed to overhaul the circuit breaker triggers. Instead of fixed Dow point drops, the thresholds were set as percentage declines: initially 10%, 20%, and 30% drops in the Dow would trigger halts of increasing severity. This change ensured the triggers would adjust with market levels (a 10% decline is always 10%, regardless of whether the Dow is at 8,000 or 15,000 points). The idea was to reserve trading halts for truly large swings. Under those late-90s rules, for example, a 10% drop would halt trading for a short period (often 30 minutes), a 20% drop might halt trading longer, and a 30% crash would likely close the market for the day. These percentage-based rules remained in place through the 2000s. Notably, even during steep sell-offs like the 2008 financial crisis, the market-wide circuit breakers never triggered. Single-day losses, while severe, didn’t hit the 10% in one day threshold during normal trading hours (markets were volatile but often the largest moves happened near the close or over multiple days).

Modern Adjustments to the Stock Market Circuit Breakers

In 2012, regulators refined the system further, integrating lessons from events like the 2010 “flash crash.” They switched the reference index from the Dow to the broader S&P 500 index and adjusted the trigger levels to 7%, 13%, and 20%, which are the levels still used today. At the same time, the halt durations were standardized (15 minutes for Level 1 and 2, as noted earlier). The late-afternoon cutoff rule was also formalized: if a Level 1 or 2 decline happens after 3:25 p.m., the market stays open (since a halt that close to 4:00 p.m. could just delay inevitable moves into the next day). The Level 3 20% drop rule, however, remains a hard stop no matter what time of day, as a fall of that magnitude mandates shutting down for the rest of the session.

By moving to the S&P 500 (which better represents the overall market) and by tightening the percentages, the circuit breaker system was made both more relevant and more responsive. It’s also coordinated across all U.S. exchanges and trading venues, ensuring that if a halt is triggered, it’s truly market-wide.

Notable Instances Since 1997

Interestingly, from the late 1990s up until 2020, these market-wide circuit breakers were almost never triggered. They became a bit of a background safety net, known to traders, but seldom used. Even during the turmoil of the Dot-Com bust (2000–2001) and the 2008 financial crisis, the daily market drops never crossed the trigger levels during the trading day. That changed in March 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic sparked one of the fastest market crashes in history. In a span of just two weeks (March 9–18, 2020), the U.S. market hit the Level 1 circuit breaker four times, each time after the S&P 500 fell 7% shortly after the opening bell. These were the first market-wide trading halts in over two decades.

It was a dramatic confirmation that the system was still relevant!

In each case, trading paused for 15 minutes. Three of those halts seemed to have the intended effect: when trading resumed, the market’s decline stabilized around the –7% level for that day. (On one particularly bad day, March 16, the market kept dropping even after the halt, eventually closing nearly 13% down, which also triggered discussions about whether a Level 2 halt should have occurred sooner.) Overall, the consensus was that the circuit breakers helped to calm the free-fall, at least temporarily, by preventing a blind panic sell-off.

Aside from those 2020 events, the only other time the modern percentage-based circuit breakers came close to activation was an August 2015 flash crash and a few other volatile days, but in those cases the intraday drops stopped just short of the thresholds (and were mitigated by other mechanisms like single-stock halts). Thus, in U.S. market history, notable triggers of the market-wide circuit breaker remain rare: the 1997 mini-crash and the March 2020 COVID panic are the standout examples. Each of these incidents reinforced why circuit breakers exist: to act as a pressure-release valve when the market is in free-fall.

Circuit breakers have become a key part of U.S. stock market infrastructure since 1987. Their origin lies in the attempt to avoid a repeat of Black Monday’s chaos, by creating deliberate pauses during extreme selling. Their purpose is to stabilize: by halting trading briefly, they aim to check panic, improve information flow, and give investors a moment to regroup. Over the years, the mechanics of circuit breakers have evolved (from fixed Dow point drops to percentage-based triggers on the S&P 500), but the fundamental idea remains the same. U.S. market history shows that while these circuit breakers are infrequently used, they have played a crucial role during a few notable crashes – most prominently in 1997 and 2020 – and they stand ready as a kind of emergency brake to maintain orderly markets.

More By This Author: