The Concealment of Shrinkflation in Economic Reporting

The increasing prevalence of "shrinkflation"—the reduction in product size or quality while maintaining or raising prices—has sparked a broader discussion about the accuracy of economic indicators, such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Gross Domestic Product (GDP). While shrinkflation is now more evident on store shelves, its role in official economic reporting remains obscured. This concealment prevents a transparent understanding of the inflationary pressures affecting consumers and businesses alike, ultimately distorting the foundation upon which fiscal policies are crafted.

The CPI, which is intended to reflect changes in the price levels of a basket of goods and services, often fails to account for these subtle but significant changes in product offerings. When shrinkflation is ignored in economic reporting, the CPI underestimates the true cost burden on consumers, suggesting that inflation is lower than it actually is. This inaccurate reflection skews the data that inform monetary policy, leading to decisions that inadequately address the real economic challenges facing households and businesses.

Moreover, these misrepresentations have downstream effects on GDP measurements. If product value is artificially maintained despite diminished offerings, GDP calculations may inaccurately suggest economic growth or stability when, in reality, consumers are receiving less value for their spending. Investors, policymakers, and businesses are left relying on data that doesn’t fully represent the lived experience of inflation, which in turn leads to misguided fiscal and investment strategies.

The lack of transparency in accounting for shrinkflation not only affects public trust in economic reporting but also exacerbates the divide between official narratives and consumer reality. As enterprises make strategic choices to cope with inflation, consumers shoulder the hidden costs while fiscal policy, guided by incomplete data, struggles to address the root issues. A transparent approach to economic reporting—one that fully incorporates shrinkflation—would offer a truer reflection of the state of the economy and foster more accurate policymaking, ultimately benefiting commerce and consumers alike.

For investors, businesses, and policymakers to operate with clarity, it is crucial that economic indicators like CPI and GDP accurately reflect the reality of inflation in all its forms, including shrinkflation. Only by acknowledging these hidden dynamics can we ensure that fiscal policies and investment strategies are built on a foundation of truth, not obscured by incomplete data or concealed economic pressures.

To my knowledge there isn’t a specific, widely recognized metric that quantifies the "prevalence" or "latency" of shrinkflation in economic data over time, there are ways shrinkflation can be examined through indirect means, and creating a more tailored metric could fill that gap.

Existing Metrics and Approaches:
Consumer Price Index (CPI) Adjustments: CPI tracks price changes for a basket of goods but often fails to fully account for shrinkflation because it focuses on price per unit rather than price per ounce, per square foot, or per count. In some cases, there have been attempts to adjust for changes in package sizes, but these are inconsistent. This suggests that CPI underestimates the actual inflation felt by consumers when shrinkflation occurs.

Hedonic Adjustments in GDP: In GDP and CPI calculations, there are "hedonic adjustments" meant to account for changes in quality (e.g., when tech products improve), but the reverse—diminished quality due to shrinkflation—is less frequently accounted for. These adjustments might look at quality improvements but often ignore when quality or quantity decreases, thus distorting the true economic experience.

A New Metric: A metric such as the "Shrinkflation Gap" (SG) could be created to quantify the discrepancy between what consumers believe they are purchasing (e.g., a foot that is 12 inches, a pound that is 16 oz.) and the actual quantity or quality they receive. This metric would help capture the "gap" in value consumers experience over time due to shrinkflation.

Key Components of the Shrinkflation Gap Metric:
Product Deviation Index (PDI): Track the deviation in product quantity or quality over a specified period (e.g., 10 years). For example, if a candy bar used to be 16 oz. but is now 13 oz, the PDI = (16-13)/16 = 18.75% shrinkage. This could be aggregated across industries and products to produce an average shrinkage percentage, which could reflect the "prevalence" of shrinkflation and correlate to the real rate of inflation.

CPI Deviation Comparison (CDI): Compare the PDI to the reported inflation rate in the CPI. The difference between the two would give an idea of how much inflation is underreported due to shrinkflation. CDI = (PDI - Reported CPI) would quantify the gap between consumer reality and government-reported data.

Shrinkflation Latency (SL): Just as "latency" describes a delay in data transmission, Shrinkflation Latency could quantify the time gap between when shrinkflation occurs and when (or if) it's reflected in economic indicators. For example, if a product shrinkage occurs in 2021, but economic models don’t recognize or adjust for it until 2023, this 2-year lag represents the latency of shrinkflation being reported in economic data. This could be tracked over time to show if shrinkflation is more quickly or slowly incorporated into economic reports.

Shrinkflation Impact Index (SII): This index could reflect the overall economic impact of shrinkflation on household budgets, combining the PDI (how much products have shrunk) with consumer expenditure data to show how much more consumers are paying for less. This metric would help identify industries where shrinkflation has the most impact, such as food, household goods, or personal care items.

Application of the Metric: Using a metric like the Shrinkflation Gap, policymakers, economists, and investors could better understand:

• The gap between official inflation numbers and consumer reality.
• How much shrinkflation is contributing to underreported inflation, affecting both fiscal policy and corporate earnings reports.
• The delay in incorporating shrinkflation into economic data, revealing weaknesses in economic indicators like the CPI and GDP.

By making this metric part of regular economic reporting, governments could provide a clearer picture of inflation’s impact, and businesses would be more accountable in how they manage inflationary pressures. Creating the Shrinkflation Gap metric would highlight the discrepancy between the real economy and reported data, bringing to light the actual inflation consumers experience which remains masked in the official data reported.

More By This Author:

Fiscal Transparency And Its Price
When Autonomy Is Not Autonomous
The Concept Of Money