Ruby Tuesday: The Stupid Simple Reason Chipotle Keeps Eating Their Lunch

Next week, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (NYSE:CMG) will announce their Q4 earnings, and once again it will show them gobbling up market share.  How much market share? Well, enough to rocket their stock price from $300 in January 2013 to $717 in January 2015. 

Much has already been written by quants, analysts, and researchers about the reasons for this massive growth, but I’m sorry, you don’t just DOUBLE+ your stock price in 24 months because of “Fresher ingredients” or cool tag-lines like “Food with Integrity,” so I’ll tell you the real reason…

It’s the Economy, Stupid

In 2008, I authored an eBook entitled “Banks, Tanks & Angst - How Long Will America Idle?”

(Cool Cleveland: Banks, Tanks & Angst – How Long Will America Idle?) in which I predicted a massive economic collapse lasting 3-5 years because of a financial disconnect which I coined “Lagflation."  Lagflation is defined as, “A condition in which the average American income LAGS the cost of the average American lifestyle.” While over 15 specific events and macro trends predicted in this book have since transpired, I was partially wrong on one important point, namely that this Lagflation would only last 3-5 years  - as it is now 2015, and this economic malaise and disconnect is still with us…7 years later!

The reason for Chipotle’s meteoric success is simple – they sell good food for 50% less than the alternatives (or “substitutes” as they’re called in Marketing 101).

Here’s the math that millions of Americans like me do every day.  It’s dinner time.  I’d like to enjoy a meal containing a hearty portion of protein (beef/steak) and carbohydrates (potatoes/beans), but I don’t want to cook.  If I get a table for two at Ruby Tuesday, here’s what I’d pay:

$9.99 Cheeseburger and fries

$9.99 Cheeseburger and fries

$2.39 Diet Coke

$2.39 Diet Coke

$24.76

+ $2.23 Tax

$26.98

+ $4.04 tip (15% Tip)

$31.02 Total

However, if I wanted to get carry-out for two at Chipotle, here’s what I’d pay:

8.74 Steak Burrito (includes rice, beans, etc.)

8.74 Steak Burrito (includes rice, beans, etc.)

$17.48

+ .50 (Diet Coke from fridge – 2 servings from 2 liter bottle)

$17.98 Total

So, there’s your answer. Every day, American consumers  - challenged with “solving supper” -  are voting with their wallets and deciding, “I would rather pay $17.98 for carry-out at Chipotle and drink my own Diet Coke at home (and pay .50 cents versus $5.00+) and thereby “solve supper” for around $18, versus paying over 50% MORE ($31) by eating at Ruby Tuesday (RT).

Consumers aren’t stupid. They’ve figured out that they can avoid the cost of tipping by eating at places without waiters, and they can avoid paying tax on food if they order carry-out. By cutting out a 9% sales tax, a15%-20% tip, and a 10x mark-up on beverages, they can keep 50% MORE of their flat-lining wages. Here’s how that math plays out over a week or a month:

  • The cost for a week of Ruby Tuesday dinners-for-two would be $217.14   ($11,291 for a year)
  • The cost for a week of Chipotle dinners-for-two would be $125.86   ($6,544.72 for a year)

When you already have a 50% cheaper solution, AND THEN add branding like “Fresher ingredients” and “Food with integrity”…it’s a no-brainer.

Still don’t believe me – try this. Ruby Tuesday (RT) stock WAS at $14.84 in January 2011 and by January 2015 had dropped all the way down to $5.82.  Sure, you could blame the “Economy” or the “Polar Vortex,” but under these SAME economic conditions, Chipotle’s stock managed to double from $300 in January 2013 to $717 in January 2015. 

So now you know the stupid, simple reason Chipotle keeps eating their lunch.

(Small Print)

  • Tax rates vary from state to state, as do variances in how/what consumables are taxed.
  • Waiters are valuable employees and should be fairly compensated for their hard work (I know, I was in food service as a youngster).
  • Yes, I take my wife out on dates, and actually eat in restaurants and enjoy paying for the experience of good service.
  • While these aren’t true apples-to-apples comparisons (e.g. one is on-site and one is carry-out), they are the decisions and trade-offs the consumer makes every day in search of value.  The hemorrhaging of Ruby Tuesday’s stock price while Chipotle’s continues going through the roof shows that consumers are voting with their wallets and prioritizing one “value experience” over the other.
  • Just as consumers have gravitated towards CUV’s which combine the best of sedans and SVU’s, the fast casual segment combines the best of both food worlds – a food quality which is higher than fast food AND a price which is significantly less than casual dining.
  • I have no positions in any of the stocks or industries referenced above.

Disclosure: I have no positions in the stocks or industries referenced above.

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Wendell Brown 9 years ago Member's comment

I think you're trying too hard to make your point. I agree with the others who have pointed out the 'apples to oranges.' Yes, sit-down restaurants have suffered and 'upscale fast food' places have benefited. But Chipotle does offer sit-down. I think you have vastly oversimplified this equation.

Doug O'Bryon 9 years ago Contributor's comment

Wendell: Thanks for your feedback, and yes, I have purposely "vastly oversimplified" this equation - that was my intent, starting with the title "..Super Simple Reason..." Intelligent investors often over-think or over-look the obvious, namely that Americans will continue to act in their own best interest and continue to seek out the best of both worlds (price AND product) - and currently Chipotle is giving it to them. Yes, Chipotle does offer sit-down options, but their meteoric rise shows that consumers place a higher value on "being their own waiter" and tip themselves - rather than put that 15-25% tip in someone else's pocket. Best, Doug

Ryan Lizotte 9 years ago Member's comment
Really love the "voting with their wallets" phrase - it rings pretty true for most demographics.
Doug O'Bryon 9 years ago Contributor's comment

Thanks Ryan. Like I always say, "Don't listen to what consumers say, listen to what they DO." Wallets don't lie. Best, Doug

Kurt Benson 9 years ago Member's comment

While I think you that you are right on the money for the most part - during a tough economy people will spend more at less expensive venues. But that's where my agreement ends.

While I enjoyed your article, I think this is overly simplified. For one thing, as you admitted, this is not an Apples to Apples comparison. The simple act of eating at home vs/ eating in store creates a huge discrepancy in price. Wouldn't it be better to compare Chipotle to McDonalds or Taco Bell? And if so, why aren't those companies gaining more market share at a comparable rate?

Doug O'Bryon 9 years ago Contributor's comment

Kurt: Sounds like we're on the same page. Yes, this is simplified (hence the title), but sometimes analysts miss the forest for the trees when it comes to figuring out the mind of the consumer. Also, as mentioned at the end, Chipotle for the consumer represents the "great compromise" between significantly higher comparative costs (ala RT) and significantly lower quality (Consumer Reports ranked McD's Big Mac "the worst" in 2014). Chipotle remains that elusive Goldilocks ROI proposition (in taste AND value), and their noble efforts toward sustainability and integrity (see their recent pork decision) make them too easy to "pull" for in the "live-stock" market. Thanks for your comment. Doug

Kurt Benson 9 years ago Member's comment

Thanks for your reply, I'll concede your point which is a valid one. Thanks again.

Terry Caruso 9 years ago Member's comment

Good point.