Image Source: Pexels

On Wednesday morning, CPI data dropped and the Nasdaq was seen sitting at a critical inflection point. Traders in my room wanted to know what to do. Buy the level because it's on the chart? Short into strength? Wait for confirmation?

I walked them through exactly how I think about these moments. I said, "I don't ever just, like, blind-buy stuff. I put a thesis together."

That thesis has a simple structure: If X happens, then Y follows. The market gives you a condition, and that condition tells you what comes next. Not prediction. Not hope. Just logical sequencing from one level to the next.

The Chain That Built Itself

Let me show you what this looked like in real time on Wednesday.

The Nasdaq had tested the 24,912 mark overnight. That level held. The overall tone was bearish. Everyone agreed on that. But I wasn't interested in blind selling just because the market looked weak.

I stated, "So, we're not blind buying the 912 just because it's a line on our chart. That's not what we're doing." Instead, I framed the trade as a conditional statement. If the 24,912 level holds, where are we going? To the big round number at 25,000. That's our short. It'd be a nice 85-handle trade if it plays out.

But the framework doesn't stop there. Every level creates the next condition. I said, "Now hop back over 25,000. If 25,000 holds, we're going to 106."

The price did exactly that. It found pushback at the next level, the 25,250 mark. Each hold created the setup for the next move. Each rejection confirmed the thesis or invalidated it. No guessing required. "And now here you are at CPI, utilizing the same kind of logic that, if the 106 holds, we're rolling back here."

The entire overnight session into Wednesday morning was just one if-then statement after another. The levels did the work. I just had to read them correctly and position accordingly.

Why Blind Buying Destroys Accounts

Most traders see a level on their chart and think that's enough. The price touches the 50 mark, they buy. The price touches resistance, they short. No context. No thesis. Just mechanical execution of lines on a screen.

That approach works -- until it doesn't. And when it stops working, those traders have no framework for understanding why. The problem is simple. A level by itself means nothing. The level plus context plus conditional logic gives you an actual trade.

Wednesday's position at the 24,912 level was a perfect example. If I had bought that level blindly because it showed up on my chart, I would have gotten run over. The overall tone was bearish. The market was inside the expected move. The conditions said short, not long. As I said, "The overall tone is bearish, is it not? Kind of, everybody agrees with that. This is bearish. So, we're not blind buying the 912 just because it's a line on our chart."

The if-then framework forces you to acknowledge context before you click the mouse. It makes you articulate what needs to happen for the trade to work. And it gives you clear invalidation points when the thesis breaks down.

Contract Roll Volatility Made It Harder

This week brought an extra layer of complexity. We rolled from the December contract into the March contract on Monday and Tuesday. That kind of transition often creates volatility that can make normal setups behave abnormally. I said, "What tends to happen in contract rolls is this right here. You get some wild price action because you have all the volume leaving that other contract, and positions are being reestablished into this contract here."

Monday pulled 60 handles out of the tape in a single morning session. That's the kind of move that destroys traders who aren't managing risk properly.

I recommended trading micros throughout the week. Not because I was scared. Because the conditions demanded smaller size and wider stops. The ATR on the Nasdaq hit 31 on Wednesday morning. That's at the threshold where I start adjusting my approach.

I said, "If you really wanted to trade the NQ during this morning, huge ATR stuff, I would go to like a 10-minute chart. I would go to, like, a 15-minute chart or a 30-minute chart. I would sell or buy and sell a couple micros at a time; be able to take some heat on trades."

The if-then framework doesn't change during high volatility. But the execution parameters do. Same logic. Different sizing. Different timeframes. Same discipline.

How to Actually Use This

Every trade I take follows the same structure. Here's how to implement it yourself.

First, identify your key level. This could be a round number, a 50 mark, the overnight high or low, the expected move boundary. Whatever level matters most based on current price action.

Second, determine the condition. Is the price approaching from above or below? What's the overall bias? Is this the first test, or has the level already been tagged multiple times?

Third, build your if-then statement. If this level holds, the price goes to that target. If this level breaks, the thesis is invalid and you're out.

Wednesday's session provided multiple examples. If the 50 mark holds, we get a result of 62. If we buy at 53, our risk is underneath the 50 mark. We're just paying up for it a little bit. The target and the risk are built into the same statement.

On Monday, the same logic applied during the contract roll chaos. As I said, "If the 412 can hold as resistance, we come all the way back here to 333. But if they can't hold this, they open up a potential move to the 500 up there."

The levels create the roadmap. The conditions tell you which direction to travel. The if-then structure keeps you from making decisions based on emotion or hope.

The Levels I Eat, Sleep, and Breathe

Someone asked me on Wednesday about all the lines on my chart. They wanted to understand how I keep track of everything.

I answered, "When I tell you guys I eat, sleep, and breathe this stuff, I do. So this what you're seeing on the chart, these levels; I know it looks like a lot. This maps out 1000 points of price."

Every level has a purpose. Every level connects to the next. The 26 level leads to the 33 figure. The 33 mark leads to the 50 level. The 50 level then opens up to the 62 mark. And so on.

Our Golden Setup methodology is built around these connections. You don't need to memorize a thousand levels. You need to understand how they chain together. If this holds, we go there. If this breaks, we go somewhere else. That's the entire framework. Simple conditional logic applied to specific price points. No indicators screaming at you. No complex algorithms. Just if X, then Y.

Next Week Brings More Opportunities

The contract roll volatility should settle down. The market will find its footing in the new March contract. The levels will reset for a fresh weekly pivot.

And the framework will work exactly the same way it always does. When price tests a level, I won't be guessing. I'll be asking the same questions I ask every single session: If this holds, where are we going? If this breaks, what does that tell me?

The traders who understand this framework will be ready. The traders who are still blind-buying lines on their chart will keep wondering why their setups aren't working.

The levels give you the roadmap. The conditions give you the context. The if-then structure gives you the trade. Everything else is just noise.

More By This Author: