Image Source: Unsplash

On Tuesday morning, the price of the NQ descended into the 26 area. My finger hovered over the buy button. But before I pulled the trigger, I did what I always do: I looked left.

No prior test from above. No green bar acting as a wall. This was the first test in the flow of price action.

I bought it at the 26 level. The price ripped to the 33 mark. We trailed our stops and rode it all the way to the 50 area for a 24-point winner. That single habit made the difference between a textbook setup and a coin flip.

What "First Test" Actually Means

I said something on Tuesday that I want every trader to internalize: "If you walk away with anything from this session today, it's being able to identify the first test versus a second or a third or a fourth."

Most traders hear "first test" and assume it means the first test of the day. Or the first test of the week. It doesn't. A first test is the first test in the flow of price action. That distinction changes everything.

Here's how I explained it in the trading session. The level acts as resistance on the way into it from below. It acts as support on the way into it from above. But that behavior degrades with each subsequent test.

The first test has the highest probability of success. By the third or fourth approach, the edge has faded. The setup might still work, but you're no longer putting your best foot forward.

How to Count Tests

Someone in the room asked how to determine whether a test is first, second, or third. The answer is simple but requires discipline: Look left. Count the approaches.

A test requires price to travel at least 10 points before returning to the level. So if price comes from 10 below, touches the level, pulls back 10, then returns, that's two tests.

Tuesday's setup was clean. The price descended from the 50 level. It hit the 26 mark for the first time from above. No prior approaches. No exhausted level.

At the time, I said, "We look left and say there has not been a test of the 26 from above. Therefore, this is the first test." That pre-flight checklist takes three seconds. It can save you from entering a setup that's already been depleted.

When the Level Is Already Spent

Thursday gave us the opposite scenario. The NQ was grinding around the 26 level. It looked like a setup at the same level that worked beautifully on Tuesday. But when I looked left, I saw two prior tests. One here. One there.

As I said on the day, "26 looks like it was a nice trade. It's already worked twice. So there's two tests right here of the 26. So we can't buy that. We can't just put a bid in there to buy that."

Same level. Same chart. Completely different trade. Tuesday's 26 mark was fresh. Thursday's 26 level was spent. The only way to know the difference is to look left before you click.

The Math We're Actually Trading

I spent years reverse engineering this methodology. Thousands of setups. Thousands of tests. Like I said, "Over thousands of setups, occurrences if we want to call them that, the long 26 has a super high probability of reaching up to the 33. Did you see how fast it did that?"

That probability isn't random. It's built into the structure of how the NQ moves.

But probability fades with repetition. Each test of a level reduces the likelihood that the next test will hold. The first test gives you the highest edge. The second test is acceptable. The third test is marginal. And the fourth test is a coin flip at best.

This is why I tell traders we're not trading setups, we're trading math: "All we're trading is math. That's it. What gives us an edge is the ability to identify risk." Identifying risk starts with one question. Is this a first test?

Thursday's Lesson

Thursday was rough. The tape was choppy. The NQ was below its opening range and acting erratically. As I said at the time, "It's honestly a battle every single day lately. January's are always a little funky."

I took some stops, gave back some gains, and left the session frustrated. But I didn't blow up. I didn't overtrade. I didn't force setups that weren't there. Why? Because the methodology kept me out of the worst positions.

When I looked at the 26 level on the NQ on Thursday and saw two prior tests, I stayed out. When I saw the 50 level test that had potential to fail, I backed away. I said, "We have to back away from this. We cannot buy that. It has potential to fail."

This framework protects you on the bad days just as much as it pays you on the good ones.

The Pre-Flight Checklist

Before every entry, I run through the same questions. This takes seconds, not minutes.

• Is this a first test? Look left. Count the approaches. If the level has already been tested multiple times, the probability has shifted.
• Is price action approaching from above or below? The same level acts as support from above and resistance from below. Know which direction you're trading.
• Has a large bar created a wall? When a significant candle prints through a level, you can't look beyond it for prior tests. The wall resets the count.

This checklist doesn't guarantee winners. Nothing does. But it puts you in the highest probability positions available.

What January Has Taught Me

This first week of 2026 has been a grind. Every trading session feels like a battle for liquidity. The tape probes and chops and refuses to give clean moves.

That's January for you. It's always a little funky. But the methodology still works. Tuesday's 24-point winner came from the same framework I've been trading with since 2016. The levels haven't changed. The probability hasn't changed. What changes is my ability to identify which setups are fresh and which are exhausted.

Look left. Count the tests. Put your best foot forward. The traders who master that habit will survive January's choppiness and be ready when the market starts trending again.

More By This Author: