One Trillion Dollars Is Trump Change For The Markets

Today, CNBC reported that the combined increase for the S&P 500 Large-caps, S&P 400 Mid-caps and S&P 600 Small-caps has been over $1 Trillion since the US  2016 presidential election. That’s not chump change gentle readers. That’s Trump change!

Oh well, I couldn’t resist the pun and these days find myself challenged to continue commenting on what I regard to be a fundamentally overbought market, despite the technical trends being bullish. What concerns me most is the divergence in market fundamentals and technicals. A moment of clarity can happen in a heartbeat and, when it does, make sure you have buckled your chinstrap and seatbelt.

Then again, hope springs eternal and the forward and upward spring in the market is based on hopes of tax cuts, infrastructure spending, and other pro-economic growth measures. The other side of the coin with a gamble on Trump is uncertainty. Yet, Trumpism is “yugely” bigger than Trump. It is my opinion that he merely represents the oscillating sentiment of backlash against globalization.

Therefore, Donald is not the lone ranger of trade protectionism. Look to England’s Brexit and the election landscape of Europe for more clues and accomplices. If these are not enough, then there is also the stinging whip of the dragon, which is China’s potential retaliatory response to foreign trade policies and geopolitical flirtations with Taiwan. Provocation of a sleeping giant is not wise and could also make the world tremble.

At the moment, it makes no sense to fight the tape of a technically strong bull market as evidenced by new highs on the S&P 500 (SPY), Dow 30 Industrials (DIA) and Russell 2000 (IWM), while the Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) recovers and attempts to test its on previous records. It’s an interesting time to be an investor. Enjoy the punchbowl at this party but don’t imbibe too much hubris. Rather, be mindful that our new fearless leader does not drink at all and that he has also sold all his stocks since June 2016 so he can freely negotiate policy decisions absent of conflicting interests.  

1 2
View single page >> |

For Hillbent's full terms and conditions, please click here.

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience. Users' ratings are only visible to themselves.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Chee Hin Teh 3 years ago Member's comment

thanks for sharing