Trump’s Trade War Raises American Costs, Reduces American Incomes

It is theoretically feasible that if we impose import tariffs then those selling to us are so discombobulated that they lower their prices – and profit margins – in order to be able to carry on selling to us. The more inelastic supply is – the less it varies in response to price changes – the more this will be so. It is also possible that it is demand that is inelastic. That what we’re willing to buy doesn’t change much with price. In which case the tariffs will be added onto what we pay and they will reduce consumer welfare.

This means we’ve an empirical question here. Which is it that actually happens with Trump’s tariffs upon Chinese goods?

This paper explores the impacts of the Trump administration’s trade policy on prices and welfare. Over the course of 2018, the U.S. experienced substantial increases in the prices of intermediates and final goods, dramatic changes to its supply-chain network, reductions in availability of imported varieties, and complete passthrough of the tariffs into domestic prices of imported goods. Overall, using standard economic methods, we find that the full incidence of the tariff falls on domestic consumers, with a reduction in U.S. real income of $1.4 billion per month by the end of 2018. We also see similar patterns for foreign countries who have retaliated against the U.S., which indicates that the trade war also reduced real income for other countries.

Oh. From the conclusion:

Economists have long argued that there are real income losses from import protection. Using the evidence to date from the 2018 trade war, we find empirical support for these arguments. We estimate the cumulative deadweight welfare cost (reduction in real income) from the U.S. tariffs to be around $6.9 billion during the first 11 months of 2018, with an additional cost of $12.3 billion to domestic consumers and importers in the form of tariff revenue transferred to the government. The deadweight welfare costs alone reached $1.4 billion per month by November of 2018.

1 2
View single page >> |
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience. Users' ratings are only visible to themselves.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Alpha Stockman 6 months ago Member's comment

Gary Anderson, what's your take on this?

Carol Klein 6 months ago Member's comment

I'd be interested in Gary's thoughts as well. Personally, I think #Trump is doing more harm than good with his #tradewar.

Gary Anderson 6 months ago Contributor's comment

The article author is likely correct. And for me it goes beyond just the dollar amount of #tariffs. Tariffs mess with investments and that is a dangerous game. China helped pull us out of the Great Recession, too. Is that how we treat a nation that helped us? What if China decides to buy from other nations next time? #Trump and his trade buddies are radicals. The trade war could be far more harmful than actual changes in GDP. I hope it has a moderate effect, but if Trump miscalculated it could throw the world into a strong recession.