EC Nearly A Trillion In Bank Reserves, Where’s The ‘Money Printing?’

Over the last five weeks, the Federal Reserve has been in crisis mode. As a consequence of all its balance sheet expansions, the expansive alphabet soup of programs, along with QE6, the level of bank reserves has risen by just over $900 billion. That’s the increase leftover for the banking system after everything adds up on the asset side and whatever gets subtracted as liabilities.

Most people still call this money printing.

Just shy of a trillion in five weeks blows away anything the central bank did during GFC1. From the week of AIG/Lehman until the middle of November 2008, a span of 10 weeks, Ben Bernanke’s FOMC increased the level of bank reserves from practically nothing to more than $600 billion.

Powell has outdone him by an additional 50% in half the time. It has been so much so quickly, the greatest “monetary” effort in US history, you can barely see the flood on a long-term chart with the full series.

image courtesy of

And that’s exactly what Mr. Powell wants you to think has happened. The Fed’s Chairman, like those who came before, would be absolutely thrilled if you thought about what he’s been doing as an irresponsible increase in the US money supply.

Given the alternative, devastating deflation, Fed officials right now don’t care if you think this is overdoing it. John Maynard Keynes was right about that much; deflation is, by far, the worse of the two monetary evils.


Because it goes straight to the workforce, devastating the labor markets. Businesses aren’t spared, obviously, but like anything else they pass along the negative consequences to their cost structure – meaning workers.

Thus, in the depths of a deflationary crisis, it won’t matter if the central bank goes a little crazy. In fact, from the policy perspective, the crazier it seems the better off we all are.

And we can all probably agree that $900 billion in five weeks is at least theoretically in that realm.

1 2 3 4
View single page >> |

Disclosure: This material has been distributed for informational purposes only. It is the opinion of the author and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any ...

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience. Users' ratings are only visible to themselves.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
David Haggith 5 months ago Contributor's comment

Here is where I don't understand Snider with his constant claims that bank reserves are not money: "if this is massive-scale money printing, where’s the inflation?" He seems to think massive money printing has to create inflation, or the money isn't real; and that's just not how it works. Money only creates inflation if it circulates and WHERE it circulates. So, it wouldn't make a BIT of difference if the money the Fed is now creating in reserves (and elsewhere via bailout) is made of ones and zeros on a computer or if it was all Treasury money printed on presses and backed with gold stored in vaults. So long as all of it goes into bank vaults (whether reserves or actual hardened steel cases), the money will do NOTHING to cause inflation until it actually circulates. And banks can hold gold coins or silver certificates or printed Benjamins backed 100% by gold, as in the days of old; and it makes no difference at all. So long as they hoard them there will be no inflation from them, no matter how much of the stuff is made. The money in reserves is just as real because it is, in any of these forms, the chosen medium of financial exchange and trade of its generation. No money ever creates inflation if it stays out of circulation. The banks can loan on reserves to create even more money in the general economy than the Fed has put into reserves. They can do repos, and then the corporations do what they want with that money. Etc. So, is the Fed money real money. Yes. One can argue over whether it is a stable as silver certificates or gold-backed notes, but it is just as useful and does all the same things IF you choose to circulate it, rather than cling to it. So, where did all the Fed money go. Follow the inflation. It all got pumped into stocks and bonds where it created massive inflation. That doesn't make it "not money." Any person on earth who owns those stocks could trade those stocks for actual gold to someone who wanted some stock action, or could sell them for cash and go buy a new house. So, it's real money. It can be spent to buy anything! It's not that reserves were not real money. It is that the ENTIRE financial system was rigged to make it desirable to keep that money in "vaults." To keep it in those tight circles of reinvestment. One of the main drivers I've pointed out for that is the low capital-gains tax (trickle down doesn't trickle down). If you're going to offer people a lower tax rate on their profits/gains if they make the money by just buying and selling assets, why would they ever even think of using it to build a factory or some other kind of business? That's WAY more risky and takes WAY longer to see any profits if it does make profits, and THEN you get taxed at a higher rate on those profits IF you ever see them! So, no one is going to take that gamble! That's why I keep arguing that trickle-down economics absolutely guarantees all money (of ANY kind) will stay circulating in asset markets, except in those instances where the rich who can afford to play in those markets say, "I want to have some fun today" and go out and buy themselves a new yacht.

Leslie Miriam 5 months ago Member's comment

Excellent points.