China Buys US Corn, Soybean; Trade Deal Commitments Far From Satisfied

Around the same time President Trump and National Economic Council director Larry Kudlow were pumping jobs, stocks, and the V-shaped recovery on national television on Thursday morning - Reuters quoted a U.S. Agriculture Department (USDA) report that said China booked its first U.S. sales of corn and soybean since it asked suppliers (nine days ago) to guarantee shipments were not contaminated with COVID-19. 

Readers may recall, from day one of the trade deal being signed - we outlined how the number of proposed agricultural goods exported to China under the agreement was unrealistic

(Click on image to enlarge)

China's purchases of US farm goods since the trade deal was signed in mid-January has been underwhelming. With today's purchases, we're surprised the president or Kudlow didn't pump the numbers, rather Kudlow said: "We are very unhappy with China." 

Reuters, quoting the USDA report, said China's "private exporters reported the sale of 202,000 tonnes of corn and 126,000 tonnes of soybeans for delivery during the 2020/21 marketing year that begins on Sept. 1." 

For more color on China not upholding trade commitments under the deal - we turn to Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE). Their trade deal tracker (latest data from April), shows China's purchases under the trade agreement has been significantly below agreed-upon levels.

(Click on image to enlarge)

Even before the trade deal was signed - we outlined in December, vessel tracking data didn't support China was purchasing farm goods from the U.S. - instead, they abandoned North American markets for Latin American ones. 

In June, we noted again; there was no way in hell that China was buying enough agricultural goods from the U.S. to satisfy commitments. Just look at the vessel tracking map below (from early June) - a massive traffic jam of ships carrying soybeans from Latin America to Asia was seen - and just a few vessels carrying beans in North America. 

1 2
View single page >> |

Disclosure: Copyright ©2009-2020 Media, LTD; All Rights Reserved. Zero Hedge is intended for Mature Audiences. Familiarize yourself with our legal and use policies every time ...

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
William K. 11 months ago Member's comment

The failure is rather disturbing, but since the prices paid are not known, it may be that they got a better deal elsewhere..

So evidently somebody lied while the negotiations were in progress.

Am I the only one who has been lied to before? Was nobody looking at the rest of the suppliers? Did nobody wonder why China would agree to pay higher prices than those offered by others?

Certainly the loss of the sales is unfortunate,and if other buyers are not found there may be a serious surplus.

Unfortunately, given the state of our state, it may be that a whole lot of folks need to get used to eating soybeans.

Dick Kaplan 11 months ago Member's comment

It's not necessarily the case that someone lied in the negotiations. It could be that they were willing to pay higher prices here, for some concession elsewhere. There's much we're not privy to.

William K. 11 months ago Member's comment

OK, and I suppose that the failure to disclose is not the same as outright lies. And perhaps those "agreements" were not quite the same as actual contracts.

Keeping secrets is a bit different, I suppose.