Consumer Credit Growth Plunges In July With Huge Negative Revisions

The Fed reports dramatically weakening consumer credit with negative revisions too.

Consumer Credit data from the Fed, the last two months labeled are May and July, chart by Mish

Consumer Credit Report Revisions

Consumer Credit data from the Fed, chart by Mish

Revision Key Points

  • Most of the revisions are in nonrevolving, but that impacts the totals.
  • Nonrevolving credit rose $1 billion in July, from a negative $22 billion adjustment in June. The Fed revised a reported $3.735 trillion down to $3.713 trillion.
  • In turn, nonrevolving impacted the totals.
  • Total credit rose $11 billion in July, from a negative $23 billion adjustment in June. The Fed revised a reported $4.997 trillion in June down to $4.974 trillion.

Nonrevolving Consumer Credit in Billions of Dollars

Nonrevolving consumer credit data from the Fed, chart by Mish

Nonrevolving Credit Implications

Assuming the data is accurate (unlikely) or at least the revision direction is accurate (likely), mortgage and existing home sales data is suspect.

Real (inflation adjusted) nonrevolving credit peaked in June of 2021.

Consumer Credit in Billions of Dollars Since 1969

Consumer Credit data from the Fed, chart by Mish

Consumers have generally done a pretty good job of avoiding credit card debt thanks to three rounds of fiscal stimulus.

However, inflation kicked in and the stimulus money has been spent. The result is the steep rise in credit card debt as noted by the blue arrow. Let’s hone in on that.

Revolving Consumer Credit in Billions of Dollars

Consumer Credit data from the Fed, Real (inflation adjusted calculation) and chart by Mish

Stunning Steepness in Credit Card Debt Accruals

The speed at which consumers are going into credit card debt is stunning.

It’s hard to maintain lifestyles with rising inflation unless wages keep up.

The BLS and Fed believe the rate of increase in inflation is falling. Assuming the data is correct, consumers are struggling anyway.

What Happens if Jobs Take a Dive?

That’s actually the wrong question. Job revisions (there’s that word again) have been steeply negative.

BLS Job Revision Data from the Philadelphia Fed

Jobs are still positive, assuming (there’s that word again) you believe the numbers and more negative revisions (there’s that word again) are not in the works.

As long as you are making assumptions, if you are rah-rah on the strength of the Biden economy, you may as well assume GDP numbers are correct as well.

My assumption is GDP is flat out wrong and Gross Domestic Income (GDI) numbers are far more likely to be correct than GDP numbers. GDP and GDI are supposed to be the same but aren’t.

GDP vs GDI

On August 30, I commented Negative Revision to 2nd Quarter GDP, Huge Discrepancy with GDI Continues

If you are a GDP and Jobs believer you likely assume (there’s that word again) GDP is accurate. The last three quarters are +2.6%, 2.0%, and 2.1%.

In contrast, the last three measures of GDI are -3.3%, -1.8%, and +0.5% with the more recent quarter the most likely to be the most revised.

The Fed Is Making Decisions on Poor, Untimely Data, Frequently Revised

I tied many of the ideas in this post together, in far more detail (absent the credit card revisions), in my previous post The Fed Is Making Decisions on Poor, Untimely Data, Frequently Revised

Please give it a look. Meanwhile, damn the revisions, full belief ahead.


More By This Author:

Debt To GDP Alarm Bells Ring, Neither Party Will Solve This
Rental Car EV Pains, No One In Their Right Mind Wants Them Now
ISM Services Expand For The 39th Month, Prices Increase 75 Straight Months

Disclaimer: The content on Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Or Sign in with