The 7 AI Categories Were Down 4%, On Average, This Week; Up 1% In May

The 7 AI categories we track dropped, down 4.3% this week, and are now only up 1.3%  for the month of May.

Photo by Steve Johnson on Unsplash

An Introduction

The 7 AI categories tracked by munKNEE.com went down 4.3% this week after having gone up each of the last 3 weeks  and are now only up 1.3%  for the month of May. This article identifies how each category performed, in descending order, along with a description of what makes up each category, the stocks included in each category, those stocks in each category that went up or down by 10% or more in May (click on stock symbol for details), and commentary on those stocks that have made significant moves recently, where available.

  1. AI-enabled Personal Computer Category: up 9.0% in May (down 2.8% this week)
  2. Semiconductor Category: up 7.0% in May (down 2.3% this week)
  3. Quantum Computing Category: up 2.9% in May (down 1.1% this week)
  4. Custom Design EDA Software Category: up 0.4% in May (down 4.0% this week)
    • Description: The stock prices of electronic design automation (EDA) software companies creating custom designed chips is set to take off given a projected 11% CAGR in the category between now and 2028. This portfolio tracks the stock price changes of 3 companies in this category.
    •  3 Constituents:  ANSS, SNPS which is acquiring ANSS, and CDNS
  5. AI-Powered Drug Discovery Category: down 2.3% in May (down 2.1% this week)
  6. Cybersecurity Software Category: down 3.5% in May (down 6.3% this week)
  7. Cloud Computing SaaS Category: down 9.2% in May (down 7.4% this week)

Summary

The 57 constituents (54 when the 3 duplicates are removed) in the 7 categories above went down 4.3%, on average, this week and, as such, only went up 1.3% during the month of May.


More By This Author:

Largest Cannabis Stocks Declined 31%, On Average, In May
Cannabis Growth Q4 Financials Unimpressive
What Is Adjusted EBITDA? Here's How The Largest Cannabis Companies Compare

STOCKS IN THIS ARTICLE

Comments