Valuewalk Blog | Tesla Stock Short Thesis – Many New Catalysts | Talkmarkets
Contributor's Links: ValueWalk

ValueWalk was started in January 2010, with a focus on value investing and value investors. As the site has grown, the scope has expanded. ValueWalk is now a news site covering all breaking financial news with an emphasis on value investing, hedge funds, large asset managers, Tech news, and ... more

Tesla Stock Short Thesis – Many New Catalysts

Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 9:23 PM EDT

Although he is known as Elon Musk’s number one enemy, Mr. Spiegel makes most of his money from killer small cap picks.  Mark Spiegel’s Stanphyl Capital had some killer small cap picks whichare up several hundred percent in just a few months –  Readers can see below for an excerpt on Tesla Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA) from their Stanphyl’s January 2018 letter.


Blomst / Pixabay

We remain short shares of Tesla, Inc. (TSLA), which I consider to be the biggest single stock bubble in this whole bubble market—a company so landmine-filled that I think it can implode at any moment regardless of what the broad market does. To reiterate the three core points of our Tesla short position:

1) Tesla has no “moat” of any kind; i.e., nothing meaningfully or sustainably proprietary.

2) Tesla loses a huge (and increasing) amount of money despite relatively light competition but will soon be confronted with massive competition in every aspect of its business.

3) Elon Musk is extremely untrustworthy.

Early in January Tesla released a disastrous Q4 sales report, delivering only 1550 Model 3s and reducing production guidance to 5000 a week by late Q2 2018 vs original guidance of up to 200,000 in the second half of 2017, later reduced to 5000 a week by late Q4 2017 and still later reduced to 5000 a week by late Q1 2018. Seeing as that last guidance was provided just 62 days before the disastrous Q4 report/guidance revision, it raises an interesting question: is Elon Musk—widely acclaimed as “a genius”—actually an idiot, or just a stock-pumping pathological liar? Before you answer that, please allow me to provide exhibits “B” and “C”:

Meanwhile, Model S&X sales were up a bit in Q4 vs. Q3 (28,320 vs. 25,930) but nearly 3900 of those Q4 sales were net liquidated inventory, undoubtedly heavily discounted and thus most likely resulting in a record low gross margin for the quarter. (We’ll know when Tesla releases the financial results in February.) Also, those sales were almost certainly artificially juiced by fears of tax credits being eliminated both in Norway (by far Tesla’s largest European market) and here in the U.S. As it turned out however, those credits were preserved in both places and thus Tesla will see a large S/X delivery drop in Q1 2018, and keep in mind that this seventh consecutive quarter of roughly flat S/X sales is occurring before the arrival later this year and next of superior luxury EV competition from Jaguar, Audi, Mercedes and Porsche. As those cars filter into the market, S/X sales will undoubtedly head into significant decline.

Also in January, the annual Consumer Electronics Show provided a cornucopia of autonomous driving technology from many of the world’s largest and most deep-pocketed automotive and tech companies, while outside the show, GM announced plans for 2019 to produce the world’s first fleet of driverless taxis without any human controls. Then at the Detroit auto show Ford—heretofore a bit of an EV laggard—announced plans to spend $11 billion bringing 16 pure electric models to market by 2022. (Tesla was a no-show at both events.)

Also in January, Navigant Research published a new “Leaderboard Report” for autonomous driving, in which Tesla tied for dead last among 19 contenders. Here’s Navigant’s assessment: “Tesla is the outlier, with big plans and lots of public announcements, but technology that is at best dubious and some serious financial and manufacturing quality issues to mitigate.” And while we’re on the topic of Tesla now being a technology laggard, remember that in December its battery supplier Panasonic announced a partnership with Toyota (and possibly other Japanese automakers) that casts a spotlight on how technologically behind Tesla’s cylindrical battery format now is. I urge you to read this excellent summary of the event from The Daily Kanban.

Next for Tesla in January, CEO Elon Musk (or just “Elon”, as the cash-burning cult leader is referenced in the official SEC filing) signed on for a new pay deal that, when analyzed, is indicative of just how unprofitable this company will always be.

Finally in January, CNBC published an investigative report indicating that Model 3 production problems are apparently far worse than Tesla has been acknowledging, while a terrific article on Seeking Alpha reiterated the same thing using alternative data points. But eventually the Model 3 production and quality problems will be fixed, right? Perhaps, but based on the mediocre bids when current owners try to resell their brand-new Model 3s on eBay, as well as the fact that Tesla is already filling reservations from days 2 and 3 despite claiming to have had 180,000 reservations on day 1, it seems the primary demand for that car will be for the $35,000 base model rather than the ones starting at $49,000 that Tesla now sells. The problem with that is that I (and others) estimate that Tesla will lose at least $10,000 on a $35,000 car and thus won’t produce more than a token handful of them. Thus, watch for Model 3 reservations to dry up when potential buyers realize they can’t get a “mass-market affordable car” from Tesla (and instead switch to the new Leaf or Bolt), then watch those reservations really vanish when the $7500 tax credit goes away later this year. (More on that below.) And another big Model 3 headwind is that almost nothing can be done in the car without a multi-step process on the touchscreen—not even changing the windshield-wiper speed, adjusting the air vents or opening the glovebox. Thus, operating a Tesla Model 3 may potentially be as dangerous as texting while driving.

I previously mentioned that the Q4 Tesla sales bump was partially due to the feared cancellation of U.S. tax credits. Although the subsequent preservation of those credits might seem to be favorable to Tesla it actually isn’t, as U.S. Tesla buyers will only be able to apply a $7500 credit to approximately 100,000 more cars (including the phase-out period). After that Tesla will have a major price disadvantage vs. over 100 new EV models entering the market over the next few years, as its credits will have expired (after first being cut to $3750 and then $1875 during the extended phase-out) while much of the competition will just be getting started with a full $7500 credit. Additionally, pricing for much of that new competition will be cross-subsidized by highly profitable conventionally powered trucks and SUVs, so if you think Tesla loses a lot of money now trying to sell cars (and it sure does!), wait until you see what happens beginning late this year.

1 2 3 4
View single page >> |
Disclaimer: This and other personal blog posts are not reviewed, monitored or endorsed by TalkMarkets. The content is solely the view of the author and TalkMarkets is not responsible for the content of this post in any way. Our curated content which is handpicked by our editorial team may be viewed here.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.