Gary Anderson Blog | Conspiracy! Self Driving Cars And Culling The Human Population | TalkMarkets
Muckraker of the Financial System
The Fed knew about the housing bubble before it burst but lied and said they didn't: Bill HR 1424 to buy bad paper (eventually called TARP) was introduced in March 9, 2007, before there began to be bad commercial paper from private subprime RE loans, in August. I have published on two other ...more

Conspiracy! Self Driving Cars And Culling The Human Population

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 9:44 PM EDT

Update. Central to this article was the idea that Elon Musk and/or his contemporaries showed an interest in using self driving cars both to control the movement of the population and to cull unnecessary people from the face of the earth. This does not mean that Musk or his technological cohorts have the power to facilitate this radical change. There is no direct evidence that Musk has engaged in the communication spoken of here. The article was written to point out that there is talk about culling the population and talk about eliminating personal freedom with self driving cars and evidence there is some communication between some of these parties.

But certainly, when Musk said that the self driving car would result in a ban on manually driven cars, it raised red flags. Well, it was not a one off, as Musk has again in November of 2015 said a similar thing, that the manually driven car will go the way of the horse.

The disturbing talk continues from Musk. How this destruction of the gasoline powered car and the manually driven car will fuse with the futurists and eugenicists is yet to be determined, but they have more hope for their evil plans than they have ever had previously.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

There is a conspiracy of Futurists brewing. It has been brewing for quite some time, with the publication in 1968 of Paul Ehrlich's book, The Population Bomb. Fear of population growth, coupled with fear that economic growth could not keep up, has been played out in the years since the book was published.

The world has doubled in population since the book, and debt no longer causes big growth in GDP, especially since wage growth has stopped dead in its tracks. All the constant drone of these facts makes us believe that those Futurists must be right. And with the advent of self driving cars, it is estimated that a sharing society will allow for most cars to be taken off the road, which will result in the need for cars and fewer people.

Of course, that technology would decimate all the oil nations in the world, insurance companies, and jobs that depend on the manually driven auto. Eventually, as the Economist recently pitched, self driving cars would save lives, manually driven cars would be outlawed in many places, and ultimately make the employment usefulness of many people suddenly not so useful.

One wonders where the then "useless" permanently unemployed people would get the money to share the self driving vehicles. Maybe they would get a stipend until they withered away. Who knows?

By the way, that economist article was a What If article, being futuristic and pitching self driving cars at the same time. Big money is fusing these two schools. There can be no doubt.

The unnerving thing about all this is that the self driving people and the Futurists are even conferencing together. I found one example of them planning or showing interest to conference together awhile back. Natural Capitalism Solutions, a think tank in Colorado, had on its interest list the inventor of the self driving car, and Futurists.

The project was called An Economy in Service to Life. R. Buckminster "Bucky" Fuller was quoted in the about section. They knew him as Bucky. That is just creepy to me. There is no technology that meets "Bucky's" standards more than a self driving car, doing "more with less". Makes you shudder in horror, or ought to.

It turns out that the Club of Rome was a partner of An Economy in Service to Life. Of course the Club of Rome took the Population Bomb as its inspiration for population limitation decades ago.

Turns out, one of the participants at the conference was to be Tom Chi, developer of Google Glass and the Self Driving Car! So, there may be a fusion of thought between self driving inventors and Eugenicists!

If none of you are alarmed yet by this conspiracy, there is more!

It is clear to me that two things are possible when self driving cars propel the Futurists into positions of real power:

1. It will be a whole lot easier to get rid of people. The more "useless eaters", a detestable term, that society creates, the less reason to keep them around doing anything meaningful. Futurists are eugenics fanatics already even if some deny it. And if there are people that are not needed, it plays into the hands of the central planners.

And even if some of the futurists don't embrace the Eugenics movement there are lots of real Eugenics scientists, real nasty people, who spend all their time thinking of ways to cull the population, who will be pressed into service by the globalists with the money. You can't be president of the United States of America nowadays without a Eugenics scientist on the payroll, like the evil thinker John P. Holdren.

2. It will give the globalists an edge over Russia, a nation heavily dependent upon oil. Futurism and self driving cars are the globalists' ticket to World Domination. 

The old PNAC boys, William Kristol and Dick Cheney must be given hope that their globalist offspring will one day rule the world. It is ok if you physically cringe now. If you are nauseous, I fully understand. Makes you want to Rolf.

Now, the globalists are oil men too. So just how all this works out in the future is slightly up in the air. And the self driving car could be hacked. People could die, more than they think. The self driving car may not work properly in many situations. Battery powered cars could give off dangerous radiation. So, this diabolical conspiracy is not yet a done deal.

But somehow, I think that the globalist cabal wants to go down the road toward total world domination and could sacrifice some oil profits to do so. After all, they have or could, in the future, establish all of the following:

Self driving cars, strict gun control, a cashless society, negative interest rates, liar loans, deregulation of banks, fake trades in stocks and commodities, take over bitcoin as a world currency, spread of viruses, space laser advantage over Russia, and other means to seriously control the masses, are contemplated.

Some of these plans I wrote about here.

And control of the masses is really what it is all about, isn't it?

Here are three quotes that prove these people mean business. I know Elon Musk retracted his statement, but face it, as an inventor of self driving cars, he too, knows the score:

"It's too dangerous. You can't have a person driving a two-ton death machine."

And of course, here is Ehrlich on population control from the 30 population control link below:

 “Nobody, in my view, has the right to have 12 children or even three unless the second pregnancy is twins”

Here are 30 population control quotes that prove the masses are treated like a plague on the earth. Self Driving cars have the ability to make many of these folks who constitute the masses, obsolete, meaning that coercive means of birth control ( I support voluntary birth control), or even plan B, limited nuclear war, could remain a possibility. Besides the Ehrlich quote, here were four that caught my eye.

From Globalist David Rockefeller:

“The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.”

And from Bill Maher:

 “I’m pro-choice, I’m for assisted suicide, I’m for regular suicide, I’m for whatever gets the freeway moving – that’s what I’m for. It’s too crowded, the planet is too crowded and we need to promote death.”

And from Margaret Sanger, the racist founder of Planned Parenthood:

“All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class”

And this dreadful quote from Thomas Ferguson:

“There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…”

But this issue of population control spans both political parties. Coercive birth control comes from the left and threat of nuclear war to cull billions comes from the right as we see in the case of Larry Eagleburger. And, of course, I wrote about Mitt Romney and Eugenics at Business Insider awhile back. I wrote this about Mitt:

Malthus was also against  government helping the poor. And of course, that is where Romney and the conservatives come in. They would, if they had their way, cut benefits to the poor, let them die on the streets and purify the genetic code of the earth.

I concluded that article with this statement:

 Americans need to have, as a core belief, a strong abhorrence of Eugenics, that ends up being racist in almost all cases. It becomes a class struggle, from the top down as all class warfare starts. Americans must repudiate Eugenics, or we surely will go down the path of fascism. A chip determining whether you can have children or not is fascism. Face it Americans and repudiate it! 

Even Nikola Tesla, namesake of Elon Musk's company, believed you had to be of superior stock to be permitted to procreate! Now, Musk didn't name Tesla, but he may share some of his views. He does, as I pointed out above, believe that mankind (or is it just the masses?) is not fit to drive a car. Perhaps the elite are capable? Hopefully he will clarify his views instead of just retracting them in the face of criticism.

We know Musk has said he wants to leave the earth and retire on Mars. He has no faith that mankind will survive on this planet. That is the ultimate elite escape from the masses, isn't it? And Musk will make millions before people realize that populating Mars is likely just a scam.

As we continue to figure out the Republican take on the conspiracy to cull, we see that if you no longer need the nations that produce oil you can always nuke them or economically destroy them. If you think that idea of nuclear preemptive attack is farfetched, Neocon Larry Eagleburger predicted nuclear war on the Larry Kudlow show a few years back prior to his death. I was listening to the broadcast myself. He virtually guaranteed nuclear war would be waged against Russia. Neocons are funded by the same globalists who fund the Futurists, the Eugenicists and self driving cars!

For now we need Russia's oil. Maybe in the future not so much. The globalists are banking on self driving cars as a means of reducing the importance of oil producing nations. There is no question about it. The only real threat to the western globalist cabal militarily is Russia, which relies mostly on oil exports. If Yinon-like regime change does not work in Russia, economic destruction and even a nuclear first strike against that nation are on the table. You can be certain of that!

But are those self driving cars going to give the globalists what they want? Fully automated cars, level 5 in the jargon of self driving researchers, will have to mimic the brain power and eyesight of humans. Those technologies are in their infancy. The goal for production of fully automated cars is 2025.

But they may never be good enough for night traffic, high speed situations, or in times of stressful driving. But you can see the globalists will fund these cars massively, even through the government as Tesla has been funded. Once you have the batteries that work, you just need the human intelligence and eyesight and those projects are being funded as well.

And these are being funded with the approval of Futurists who want to eliminate over 1/2 the human race, up to 95 percent, according to Mikhail Gorbachov and Ted Turner. Now that is a conspiracy that could do some damage, folks. How successful this conspiracy will be is unknown, and certainly sensible birth control voluntarily applied is rational. But these folks go way beyond voluntary means. If they don't succeed, it won't be because they didn't try.

The Onion jokes that British and American scientists want to assign the masses lottery numbers so that a losing number would mean immediate death. They say that would eliminate 1/3rd of the world's population. But while we can have a good laugh at the Onion's satire, and I love satire, real planning for reduction of the population is taking place and it is no joke.  

Truth is, self driving cars will make so many people on the planet irrelevant, that their continued technological progress is almost a wet dream for the futurists, eugenicists, neocons, and of course the globalists who fund them  all. Fascism is not only alive in the Ukraine, it has been kept alive worldwide by the elite, who think they alone have a right to both rule and enjoy the world.

Disclaimer: This and other personal blog posts are not reviewed, monitored or endorsed by TalkMarkets. The content is solely the view of the author and TalkMarkets is not responsible for the content of this post in any way. Our curated content which is handpicked by our editorial team may be viewed here.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Dick Kaplan 8 years ago Member's comment

Fascinating, but if I understand correctly, your entire argument hinges on the assumption that self-driving cars will make many people irrelevant. But why?

It just means that people will be in the backseat or passenger seat instead of the driver's seat. The only people who may not be around are taxi drivers, and even some of them may prefer to stick around for the ride. And if not, they won't be the first profession to disappear and be replaced with something else.

Or am I missing the crux of your article?

Gary Anderson 8 years ago Author's comment

Hi Dick, I did not develop that thought. I only took the assumption from two points. First, oil producing nations would no longer produce oil. Those people would become unneeded. Then also, people point to the expense of owning a vehicle. Self driving vehicles would, I assume, be much more expensive than regular vehicles, hence the ride sharing would make less vehicles needed. There are other issues there, so I will look into it more. I hope others do as well.

Alexis Renault 8 years ago Member's comment

Interesting article but "conspiracy" is such a dirty word and I'm not convinced.

Gary Anderson 8 years ago Author's comment

We only see glimpses, Alexis. We can only form circumstantial evidence based on bits and pieces. You could be right, but when Musk says it will be illegal to drive your own car and the Google self driving fellow indicates interest in a conference cosponsored by the Club of Rome, you just have to wonder.