Let me say that i am surprised with the question; however, here is the answer.

There is little difference between the deal that the "el trumpo" did with the National Inquierer, than the deal the "el trumpo" has done with Fox.

And if you ask me, that is not something that i would want attached to me if i was working at Fox with their elite sycohphants.

Does that help you understand better?

And who the fuck do you think is going to win the two wars that you mentioned above?  And when those wars are over what else is there to defend.  Hiroshima and Nagasaki showed which nation had military superiority.  Similarly, Iran's 300 missile/drone attack showed which nation has military superiority today.

I am really disappointed in you Adam.  I expect better from you.  It tells me that you have not been keeping up with what i have been trying to tell you.  Either that or you have been listening too much to Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Comments like yours tell me that globanomics is dead in the water.

We all know that no one will win a nuclear war.  Period.  Yet there are a couple of things that i know that you may not--starting with the fact that the current nuclear capabilities of China, North Korea, and Iran are essentially zilch--all of their weapons could be taken out any time we choose.

It's Russia that has the arsenal that you have to worry about, but even that is now in question based upon previously unknown capabilities.

So essentially, that is where we stand with the "four bad" guys.  Of the four all you need to do is make friends with the one who has most to gain--and that is China.  And that is in the best interest of China, too.

We have that in spades.  Now it is time for everyone to disarm--starting with the nuclear bombs.

I appreciate your opinion and i will leave it at that.

I took it mildly without offense.  You probably did not know that i have been banned from writing articles for Talkmarkets because of my bad writing habits.

That was when i could publish articles.  Here is a question for you, Ms. Miller.

Do you think there would be any difference to the economy depending on who wins the election in November?

Because it will make a very, very big difference.

el fatso, golden-boy trumpo, you mean?  I will stick with Biden.  I am not caught up in your pedifile theories, which btw are false, if no one has told you that before.

I think he considers it his best--it's about 800 pages long.  They did a television series on it once with about ten or twelve episodes.  Spooky, spooky, spooky.

Here is my logic.  First, Roberts forces Thomas to recuse himself for obvious reasons.  Second, Roberts is in favor of voting in favor of Colorado (which all of a sudden makes things look like a 4 to 4 decision).  Until, third, the importance of the decision for unanimity passes through the court.  Ending, fourth, with an 8 to 0 in favor of Colorado.

I know it might sound far-fetched, but we must remember and rely upon the fact that the Supreme Court of the United States is supposed to have blinders on when interpreting the law.  And an 8 to 0 shows that the Supreme Court actually does have its blindfold on.

Some people on the left still want to run against the "el trumpo".  I am not part of that group.