Will The US Have A Recession Ever Again?

Earlier this week, Deutsche Bank's credit strategist Jim Reid suggested that the COVID recession might persuade policymakers that there is no need for a recession again: as Reid put it, so aggressive has been the policy response that the US COVID recession is likely to be the shortest on record in spite of a savage global pandemic. Well, "if you can restore growth so quickly in a period when lockdowns are prevalent, then surely a normal recession will now hold no fear and be quickly reversed."

In a follow up to this rhetorical musing, today Reid has written a longer note in which he picks up his thoughts on the theme of "no more recessions... ever", saying that this trend has been in place on a smaller scale for the last forty years. All four of the cycles since the early 1980s make the top six longest in the thirty-four recorded since 1854 and as today’s Chart of the Day shows these four supercycles have coincided with a unique move to structural deficit financing. Indeed the graph shows other long cycles all coincided with large deficits largely around wars and the New Deal in the 1930s. If it was this easy to avoid recessions why wasn’t it done all the time?

The simplistic answer is that such a policy would have been impossible when money was tied to gold and was only facilitated when the US periodically broke currency ties to gold and then permanently once the Bretton Woods system broke down in 1971. However, for a decade this was highly inflationary and disruptive economically. A miracle then occurred from the early 1980s as we saw a secular four-decade structural shift lower in inflation.

Reid then says that in his view, China's re-entry into the global economic system in the late 1970s and the natural demographics of the developed world and China ensured that the supply of global labor (much of it very cheap) surged from this point. This helped ensure that the usual pressure on wages and prices as activity rose through the subsequent cycles was more subdued than it would normally be and fiscal and monetary policy could be kept looser and ward off economic headwinds much more easily. The cost of this was huge debt accumulation and latterly huge central bank balance sheets and perhaps a structural loss of productivity.

1 2
View single page >> |

Disclosure: Copyright ©2009-2021 ZeroHedge.com/ABC Media, LTD; All Rights Reserved. Zero Hedge is intended for Mature Audiences. Familiarize yourself with our legal and use policies every ...

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.