EC The Soaring Risk Of Flying In Bernanke’s Helicopter

What Tools Does the Fed Have Left? Part 3: Helicopter Money: Bernanke Blog at the Brookings Institutes, posted on April 11, 2016

“Some have suggested an alternative approach in which the central bank prints money and gives it away—so-called “people’s QE.” From a purely economic perspective, people’s QE would indeed be equivalent to a money-financed tax cut (Friedman’s original helicopter drop, although perhaps more targeted). The problem with this policy, which would certainly be illegal in most or all jurisdictions, is not its economic logic but its political legitimacy: The distribution of what are effectively tax rebates should be subject to legislative approval, not determined unilaterally by the central bank.”

Since the bell was rung on June 24th , the day after the Brexit vote was counted the night before, the FTSE 100 dropped 592 points or 9.2% in under a day, but then over the last 13 days racked up 929 points for a 16% gain. A sign that all is well, or a big rally before the next wave of selling?  

Clearly, the “helicopter money” headlines that started this week were after a 2-week rally in US and European stocks.  

The reason was clear. Japanese stocks were close to a critical line, and needed a rally to help hold up equity markets as we came through July monthly options week. So in three days, we have a 1338-point rally, producing a gain of 8.8%.

If we then include the fact that the S&P 500 broke its May 2015 all time high on Monday the 11th, and the Dow did the same on Tuesday, May 12th, while the last 3 weeks have produced the lowest yields in centuries in the US and Britain, then it is clear that something is very wrong with the view of “helicopter money is part of our unlimited tool chest” being espoused by Bernanke, Mester, and other socialist central planners.

Only a fool would believe that given enough intervention by central banks stock prices need never deflate again. The 6,000-point drop between June 2015 high and June 2016 low in the Nikkei make that painfully clear.

View single page >> |

Disclaimer: Be a Contrarian, Remember Your History. Bulls become bears, and ...

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience. Users' ratings are only visible to themselves.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Danielle Rogers 3 years ago Member's comment

Great read.

Doug Wakefield 3 years ago Author's comment

Thank you Danielle.

Gary Anderson 3 years ago Contributor's comment

Call me a delusional nut. I know you don't mean it, Doug!

I believe there is massive demand for bonds for use as collateral in the new clearing houses for derivatives. If anything, that demand would possibly interfere with the use of helicopter money and NGDP targeting as rates could stay low anyway. After all, the Fed has to protect the collateral from being destroyed by higher rates!

But think about it, real helicopter money would not expand the balance sheet so far out of whack as it is now, and governments would collect more taxes. That would ultimately help the Fed's balance sheet in good times. In bad times, with rates going toward zero, bolstered by demand for bonds, the Fed's balance sheet could grow and it would not be a problem at all. The Lonergan plan does not make every citizen a millionaire, but is more responsible than asset buying, or all nations doing QE at the same time. Lonergan's plan acknowledges that government debt is worse than helicopter money, as properly defined.

The type of helicopter money that Japan could use is to buy Japanese debt, and set the interest rate to zero. That would be a form of helicopter money, but only for the government. The government could then stimulate the economy while debt fades away. That could help. But it isn't as good as Lonergan's plan, IMO.

One thing we know, we are headed to negative bond rates forever if something isn't done. And so call me a nut, but something needs to be done. The alternative is even more nutty, or is it nuttier?

I think all forms of helicopter money are illegal in Japan, so I think this is mostly talk. But laws can be changed.

Doug Wakefield 3 years ago Author's comment

Gary. I know that we are stuck with central banks pushing us more and more toward the global cliff. Over decades we have embraced the idea of "more debt and faster" as the solution to the latest debt crisis. All we are doing is training each generation that unlimited debt and state intervention is the only way out. That is why we are in the monumental mess we are in.Just my two cents as we watch so many first in history events, and the vast majority of the public totally clueless how much is taking place that the "expert" central planners have never seen before either. Frankly, financial socialism was never a theory I have supported.

Gary Anderson 3 years ago Contributor's comment

I wouldn't call Friedman a socialist. But, I do think central banks rarely do any sort of stimulus for the people. They do it for the wealthy. But that creates dangerous imbalances. That is why I hope they do stimulus for the masses, not UBI, but a one time helicopter money that somewhat expands the balance sheet with no government bonds involved. There are not enough of them anyway.

Doug Wakefield 3 years ago Author's comment

Gary, I am not calling# Friedman a socialist, but there are direct links between writings of #Keynes and #Marx. Deficit spending was taken from Das Capital. I agree that that #QE has done little to nothing for fueling the trillions created into developing opportunities for jobs and sustainable growth across the entire economy. Instead it has fueled the greatest gap between the highest levels of wealth and the lowest levels of poverty. This is clearly not a successful model. As long as the power to fix the problem is concentrated in the hands of less than a half dozen central banks owned by the global investment banks, I don't see how we are headed in the right direction. Wish I say commitment to the people, but I haven't and don't see it today.

Gary Anderson 3 years ago Contributor's comment

Keynes says spend through government #debt. #Friedman and #Lonergan say pay base money one time to expand the money supply. I think that is more responsible than any government debt expansion. JMO, Doug.

Doug Wakefield 3 years ago Author's comment

Gary. The track record of central banks has never been a "one and done". These organizations have come to believe there IS nothing that will stop them from printing up more money "when needed".

Gary Anderson 3 years ago Contributor's comment

Sterilized money is all they print. So, they could be hindering the economy. I think they want to hinder any prosperity, because they, again want to protect the collateral, and keep yields low. You watch, slow growth is the new normal and so is massive demand for bonds as collateral.

Moon Kil Woong 3 years ago Contributor's comment

It is sad we have to compare the US to Japan's failed run down the tube of managed economy failure. How have we gotten here. There will be a difference though. We may get inflation, but without growth which may make our experience a lot worse, but hopefully bad enough to stop from going as far as Japan has gone.

Doug Wakefield 3 years ago Author's comment

Moon. Unless govenments stand up to these global central banks, which they have no track record of doing as a group, then the banks own the nations. Just my two cents. Sure wish it were different.

David M. Green 3 years ago Member's comment

I share your sentiments.

Doug Wakefield 3 years ago Author's comment

Thanks David.