The Impact Of Business Closures On COVID-19 Infection Rates Among Essential Workers

by Constantin Gurdgiev

In a recent post, I covered the impact of the failure at the Federal level to implement more robust measures on rents and tenure security for households. Another interesting aspect of the U.S. experience during the pandemic relates to the policies concerning the closure of essential vs non-essential businesses.

essential.workers.art.graphic

 

A recent (January 2021) study by Song, Hummy and McKenna, Ryan and Chen, Angela T. and David, Guy and Smith-McLallen, Aaron, titled: "The Impact of the Non-Essential Business Closure Policy on COVID-19 Infection Rates" (NBER Working Paper No. w28374) looked at the implications of this specific policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Per authors, during the pandemic,

"many localities instituted non-essential business closure orders, keeping individuals categorized as essential workers at the frontlines while sending their non-essential counterparts home".

The authors examined

"the extent to which being designated as an essential or non-essential worker impacts one’s risk of being COVID-positive following the non-essential business closure order".

The study used data for the State of Pennsylvania, accounting for the intra-household transmission risk experienced by the workers' cohabiting family members and roommates.

The study estimated that:

  • "... workers designated as essential have a 55% higher likelihood of being positive for COVID-19 than those classified as non-essential; in other words, non-essential workers experience a protective effect.
  • "While members of the health care and social assistance sub-sector contribute significantly to this overall effect, it is not completely driven by them.
  • "We also find evidence of intra-household transmission that differs in intensity by essential status. Dependents cohabiting with an essential worker have a 17% higher likelihood of being COVID-positive compared to those cohabiting with a non-essential worker. Roommates cohabiting with an essential worker experience a 38% increase in likelihood of being COVID-positive.
1 2
View single page >> |

Disclaimer: No content is to be construed as investment advice and all content is provided for informational purposes only. The reader is solely responsible for determining whether any investment, ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.