The Conservative Case For A Child Allowance

By Samuel Hammond and Robert Orr, Niskanen Center

The United States has the highest post-tax-and-transfer child poverty rate of any country in the developed world. While many factors can affect poverty, a cross-national perspective reveals the rather straightforward reason why: our relative lack of spending on children and families. The United States spends only 0.7 percent of GDP on family social expenditures, of which the share devoted to cash benefits, 0.1 percent of GDP, is the lowest of any country in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

The United States would need to increase cash transfers to children and families by approximately $200 billion per year to merely match the cash benefit portion of the OECD average.

At the same time, the institution of American family has never looked weaker. Family formation and marriage rates have declined substantially over the last four decades, with the largest declines concentrated in the middle- and working-classes. The U.S. fertility gap - the difference between desired and actual fertility - has crept steadily higher, at least in part due to the rising costs of core goods like housing and child care. In 2019, the U.S. birth rate fell for the fifth consecutive year to its lowest level in 35 years, and it looks destined to fall even lower given estimates that the so-called “COVID Baby Bust" will lead to somewhere between 300,000 and half a million fewer births than expected.

In this report, we argue that the U.S. should enact a universal child allowance as the appropriate and philosophically conservative policy response to these twin crises. While far from a sufficient solution to either child poverty or family instability, we believe a child allowance is at the very least a necessary one - and long overdue at that. With careful design, the enactment of a child allowance would also create the conditions necessary to consolidate a variety of less effective policies and programs, including those known to encourage dependency and penalize marriage.

1 2
View single page >> |

Disclaimer: No content is to be construed as investment advice and all content is provided for informational purposes only. The reader is solely responsible for determining whether any investment, ...

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.