
On the vaccine 'spin' . . I noted some reports have changed the expression 'side effects' to just the word 'reaction', so as to seemingly minimize reported post-vaccination disorientation, fever, and pain, that some say lasted a week or so, and caused work absence for a day or two. Depending 'which' vaccines have 'that' reaction, but minimize public willingness to be inoculated, matters.
Yes I seriously contemplate postponing accepting it, even as I presume it will be offered given my age bracket (39+), so will have a chat with physician on that topic. I'm unsure about the 'early' vaccines, I have tended to prefer (still do) 'therapeutic antibodies' as that is, or will be, a way to intervene proactively should symptoms appear (and perhaps do nothing until that possibility arrives, or if one is proven to have say 6-12 months efficacy), perhaps in-lieu of any vaccine, but I cannot firmly say I have a conviction yet about how this works. I do know that big-pharmas limited the type of patients they would enroll in trial participation, although a couple more recently have broadened criteria. Many above a certain age have some co-morbidity or at least high blood pressure or similar, so outcomes (and tolerability) in such groups is rather pertinent.
By the way, not that I'm pleased at all with Sorrento (SRNE) management's optimistic outlooks, and then nothing arrives in the time-frame they estimated, I concur with the idea that 'antiviral / antibody' treatments for many may become what is the preferred way to go 'if' confronted with COVID. Note President Trump got an antibody treatment, not a vaccine. And he's relatively fine (so it seems).
|