COT Blue: The Velocity Of Capitulation

On Friday, the CFTC posted its COT data for the first week in 2019. For crude oil, capitulation. For US Treasury bond futures, capitulation. In the latter financial market, unsurprisingly the net market position utterly collapsed during December. From a relatively high (meaning market overall short) +58k contracts that last week in November when everyone piled into liquidity hedges, the updated estimate for the week of January 8 is -8k.

Total reversal.

The last time we saw one of this magnitude in UST futures was in the first few months of 2014. From late December 2013 to early April 2014, the net position went from +69k to -8k; from short UST futures because interest rates have nowhere to go but up to slightly long them as liquidity hedging returned and the dollar started to do funky things. From fairy tale to prudence.

What’s unusual this time is just how quickly everything changed. In 2013-14 during the transition out of Reflation #2 and into Euro$ #3, the collapse in the market short took 17 weeks. Now as Euro$ #4 moves in, only 7 weeks.

The effect on UST yields, the 10s in particular, has been largely the same regardless of time; the benchmark interest rate fell ~40 bps high to low during each shift. The primary difference is, obviously, what’s going on at the short end of the yield curve. In early 2014, QE was only starting to be tapered. To end 2018, QE is long gone and in its place are these “rate hikes.”

It takes something big to flip the UST curve into inversion. December 2018 and what went on absolutely qualifies – because the UST curve inverted as futures market participants capitulated. It was a paradigm change from dominant inflation expectations (thus, the market being short overall) to the more familiar deflationary sequence that starts with prominent outbreaks of liquidity hedging.

Inflation, therefore, accelerated growth had been rationalized repeatedly since the middle of 2017. The unemployment rate was just one factor supposedly pushing for it. Somewhat related, many proposed “money velocity” as another sea change in the global economy’s direction.

1 2 3 4
View single page >> |

Disclosure: This material has been distributed for informational purposes only. It is the opinion of the author and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any ...

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience. Users' ratings are only visible to themselves.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.