The Archegos Lesson – If You Fail, Fail Spectacularly?

As markets continue to dust themselves off from the fallout of the Archegos blowup, traders and pundits alike will do their best to assess the risks, opportunities, and lessons that the incident will impart. There are many serious questions that will be raised. Some are fairly obvious – should banks be a bit more judicious in the way they offer leverage to their biggest prime brokerage clients; are there chances to go bargain-hunting in stocks that bore the brunt of the margin-related selloffs; do we need to reform the amount of disclosure of equity holdings? Others are a bit more subtle – if banks are concerned about offering too much leverage to key customers, how do they reduce it without causing further disruption; is there any honor among banks who pledged to cooperate but then saw some appear to front-run the others? We discussed many of these ideas yesterday, and I have little doubt that they will remain in the investment conversation for weeks to come. Yet there is one idea that didn’t occur to me until this morning: on global Wall Street, is it better to fail spectacularly than not at all?

Gray High Rise Buildings

Image Source: Pexels

I was intrigued by a Bloomberg report that said that Julian Robertson would still invest with Bill Hwang, the man behind Archegos. They have a history together. Mr. Robertson ran Tiger Management for decades, and he was known for seeding the investments of proteges who became known as “Tiger Cubs”. Mr. Hwang rose to investment prominence as a Tiger Cub, earning money for himself and Mr. Robertson. Obviously, Mr. Robertson still has faith in the prowess of his former student. Could it be possible that Mr. Hwang will eventually be able to dig himself out of his hole and return to investment prominence?

Clearly, he has some advantages that an ordinary failure would not. If a mid-level employee at a large bank makes a trading error grievous enough to get fired, he would be likely to disappear without much of a trace. Yet investing history is rife with examples of high-level money managers coming back after significant setbacks. Boaz Weinstein and Bill Ackman are two of the most prominent hedge fund managers with excellent track records, yet each has faced losses that would have ended the careers of ordinary people.(The former lost $1.8 billion for Deutsche Bank in 2008, the latter has interspersed multi-million dollar losses among his significant gains.)A money manager operating at the highest levels of finance has a range of contacts and potential backers that even a normally well-connected financier does not. If he is able to retain the confidence of at least some of them, a comeback is possible – if not inevitable.

1 2
View single page >> |

Disclosure: 

HEDGE FUNDS

Hedge Funds are highly speculative, and investors may lose their entire investment.

MARGIN TRADING

Trading on margin is only for sophisticated ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.