Populism: The Danger? What About Debt?

Rothkopf, clearly a supporter of global power clubs, states that the World Economic forum is the "biggest of the world's elite clubs."

Since the WEF is meeting at Davos, Switzerland between January 17th- 20th as Trump is sworn in as the next US President on January 20th, it seems a good time to ask, “Why all the emphasis on populism being a huge negative to the global economy?” There have been huge risks across global markets discussed by the IMF, OECD, World Bank, BIS, and others for more than 2 years, so why the increased attention to the “populism risk” right now? From watching recent comments and headlines, it is clear someone wants the public to see populism as a huge risk to the most complacent US equity markets floating at record levels.

Davos Elite Seeks Fixes to Defend the System from Populists, Bloomberg, Jan 18 ‘17

“Squeezed and Angry: How To Fix the Middle Class Crisis” – A panel led by IMF Chief Christine Lagarde at Davos.

"Populism is the No. 1 economic issue that market participants should be watching, more important than central banks. I want to be loud and clear—populism scares me." – Ray Dalio, Head of the world’s largest hedge fund at Davos.

World Economic Forum: Inequality, Divisions Are Primary Risk to Global Economy, WSJ, Jan 11 ‘17

The problem the retail investor has with being the least bit concerned about a change from globalism to nationalism from Brexit to Trump to Italy and across many areas of the world in 2017, is that without constant “assistance” to world equity and risk on trades, the is no experience with anything remotely telling them to prepare for a large sea change.

So ask yourself, when the stock bubble pops again like 2008, was it the "middle class" who flooded trillions of debt across the global financial system at the lowest interest rates on record? Will global central planners and elites finally admit their ideas are what brought us to the top of the latest bubble, and lead to the next major bust?

View single page >> |

Do you have a plan for the next big shift? more

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience. Users' ratings are only visible to themselves.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Gary Anderson 3 years ago Contributor's comment

Supply side "populism" is not really populism. It is the elite's fake response to populism. It is status quo and fools everyone into thinking that the elite are working to fix things for the regular guy. Your article is correct, the bailouts of the busts are mainly for the elite and they will never say their ideas are wrong. Same for the Great Depression. Trickle up didn't work then either.

Doug Wakefield 3 years ago Author's comment

Gary. To me this is the most sobering aspect of QE. The global planners of markets and economies must create a narrative to move blame away from their own experiments in constantly assisting with tens of trillions in debt since 2008. To talk of "bulls go on longer than you think" without addressing the fact that at the end of the bubble a narrative has to be told the public in order to shift blame from these elite planners, it is not only horribly misleading, but Orwellian. Thanks for your comments. Keep talking to anyone who will listen to you.