How Volatility Impacts Retirement Plans
Ah volatility, we thought you were gone. But how quickly you came back:
Source: Yahoo Finance
Nowhere To Hide
There really was nowhere to hide during the latest downturn. Very similar to 2008/2009, most assets were correlated and fell together. But also just like in the 2008/2009 downturn, some equities were less volatile than others.
I frequently discuss dividend growth stocks on this website and I still believe they are the best way to retire stress-free and to weather major market downturns. One of my favorite ways to gain exposure to solid dividend growth stocks is through the Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Not only are these ETF less volatile than many other stock funds, they also have extremely low fees.
Buying Individual Dividend Payers?
If you as an investor are more interested in individual dividend-growth stocks, this is fine too. I have been a big proponent of Procter & Gamble (PG), Altria (MO), and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) for years now. Let’s compare how they did during the most recent downturn:
Price Change 1/26 - 2/8 |
|
S&P 500 |
-10.1% |
Procter & Gamble |
-8.5% |
Altria |
-9.8% |
Johnson & Johnson |
-13.0% |
Source: Yahoo Finance
Let’s also take a look at how they did in the large downturn in 2008:
Price Change Jan. 2008 - December 2008 |
|
S&P 500 |
-32.7% |
Procter & Gamble |
-13.5% |
Altria |
-2.8% |
Johnson & Johnson |
-2.5% |
Source: Yahoo Finance
It shouldn’t be too surprising that solid dividend payers are less volatile over time since dividends represent a large portion of their overall return. Because dividend payments are more stable than price growth, this makes total sense.
Strong Dividend Payers For Retirement Portfolio
I would like to show a real case study using the WealthTrace Retirement Planning Software program. I took a couple who is 43 years old and has $375,000 saved. They will spend $51,000 a year in retirement. In my first scenario I have them at 75% stocks and 25% bonds. All of their stocks are invested in the S&P 500. I used Monte Carlo analysis to calculate their probability of never running of money. The results are below:
This won’t cut it. Talk about stressing out as retirement approaches. We want to boost their chances in retirement significantly. The way I am going to do this is to move them out of the S&P 500 and into the dividend appreciation ETF. This helped lower my overall volatility by 28% in my retirement portfolio. I re-ran the Monte Carlo analysis and found our couple’s chances of retirement success jumped to 67%.
This is a large increase and shows how big of a factor volatility is in retirement. We really shouldn’t be asking, do I need $1 million to retire, $2 million to retire, $3 million to retire, or how much? We should really be asking what our chances of never running out of money are. Monte Carlo helps us figure this out.