Reading Roundup: Looking For Resilience

The Wall Street Journal looked at whether the 401k is "broken" as well as changes proposed by Joe Biden. The idea behind it being broken is that higher income earners get favorable treatment because their deduction is larger so Biden is proposing replacing the deduction with a $2600 tax credit. If you make $40,000 you get a $2600 tax credit, you make $400,000 you get a $2600 tax credit.

Without speculating on whether this ever comes to pass, let alone guessing about the outcome of the election, if it does come to be, that will not be a reason to save any less for your retirement. This Biden scenario would seem to make Roth IRAs more attractive than they already are, maybe the only game in town (other than HSAs) if you're lucky enough to have a high income. As best as I can tell, his objective is fairness not discouraging saving. And while you may disagree with his idea of fairness, it is still your retirement, it is your responsibility to determine your outcome because no one will care more about your retirement or any other of your outcomes more than you.

Barron's had a writeup about carbon/ESG investing. Included in there was a mention of the KFA Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) It is a futures-based ETF and it is a tiny fund. In the interest of always being curious, I want to know whether KRBN could be an uncorrelated asset to equities. Long time readers will know I am a huge believer in small exposures to low or uncorrelated assets. Maybe a fund tracking carbon futures fits the bill?



The fund has only been around for a month and half so it is too early to tell for sure. Intuitively, I could see the fund as being pro-cyclical. When the economy is doing well and business is strong then companies might be willing to pay for the added expense of carbon credits. I will try to keep tabs on this and follow up in a few months.

Jason Zweig took a look at low volatility ETFs and the extent to which a couple of the more popular ones might have let investors down through the crash (going down the same amount as the broad market) and the recovery (not keeping up with the broad market on the snap back). When the Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) first came out I was favorably disposed to the concept but noted at the time the risk of being 30% in utilities. Currently it's largest weight is healthcare at 25%. The ETF space then evolved to the point where I thought (and still think) that volatility can be better managed with different strategies/fund that I have written about many times before, some of which are in the chart above.

1 2
View single page >> |

Disclaimer: The information, statements, views, and opinions included in this publication are based on sources (both internal and external sources) considered to be reliable, but no ...

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience. Users' ratings are only visible to themselves.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.