Finding Winning Power Trades – The Process

Many people have asked me to further explain the process of coming up with my recommended best winter trade (posted on October 9th, 2014, which on 10/28/2014 was up over 20% in less than a month):

With that being said, the initial setup best trade for winter from my perspective is to buy the December On-Peak spread of AD-Hub minus NYJ  (Buy AD-Hub and sell NY-J).

Obviously the root of finding the trade was to use Power Market Analysis Near Term (PMA-NT).  As I have noted many times PMA-NT is more of a service than a product.The default setup is still very useful without any customization, which I will demonstrate here. PMA-NT default is based on the forward curve.  In this setup, the arbitrage being found is the disconnects between gas futures and power futures. In essence, gas futures get lost in translation converting to power futures due to the moving parts in the power sector. PMA-NT can help find those translation errors. PMA-NT can also be fed your fundamental outlook of natural gas markets to find those disconnects.

Part of PMA-NT includes some very advance and powerful trading tools. There are about 650 trading opportunities calculated in the default PMA-NT within in just 1 case (more can be added). The PMA-NT default runs five potential scenarios of the future. In order to find out my best winter trade I used a new customizable trade screener tool called Double Value versus One Sided Screener. Double value screens out all the trades with at least a double value relative to the potential loss.This list quickly reduces the 650 trading options.  Given I wanted a winter trade and something that didn’t hold the risk of the Vermont Yankee nuclear retirement I filtered the results for Dec 2014 Winter.  I also wanted a liquid contract so I filtered for On-Peak. Then finally I sorted by Max gain. All this occurred on one page in less than a few key strokes – screenshot below.

In the five cases simulated on 10-08-2014, the results show two trades that qualify on the logic that I wanted On-Peak trades in Dec 2014 that would have the potential to gain more than twice the loss potential. Out of the five outlooks simulated by PMA, there was a case that showed a potential gain of $31.25/MWh if one sold the NY-J On-Peak Dec 2014 contract. Inversely there was a case that would show a loss of $6.5/MWh. The default 5 cases involved moving the Henry Hub prices and altering weather impacts. These cases can be customized for your region of interest. Further descriptions of the default cases are available.

1 2 3
View single page >> |

At All Energy Consulting we understand supplying you with forecasts is only one step of the process and may even be the smallest value of the process.   The real value comes from the ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.